RE: Unbelievers, refute this argument!
April 14, 2015 at 1:39 pm
(This post was last modified: April 14, 2015 at 1:40 pm by Aoi Magi.)
(April 14, 2015 at 9:24 am)Pizz-atheist Wrote:
The conclusion(3) follows logically and inescapably from the premises(1&2). Your move unbelievers!
- If cats exist, then Russell's teapot exists.
- Cats exist.
- Then, Russell's teapot exists.
- If cats exist, then Russell's teapot exists.
- Conversely, if Russell's teapot exist then cats exist.
- Russell's teapot don't exist.
- Then, cats don't exist.
Quote:To know yet to think that one does not know is best; Not to know yet to think that one knows will lead to difficulty.
- Lau Tzu
Join me on atheistforums Slack (pester tibs via pm if you need invite)