RE: Fallacies in an "Answered Prayer" explanation?
April 23, 2015 at 3:54 pm
(This post was last modified: April 23, 2015 at 3:57 pm by Clueless Morgan.)
(April 23, 2015 at 2:35 pm)Minimalist Wrote:Quote:Thoughts?He's a putz.
He is a she, actually.
(April 23, 2015 at 1:05 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: It seems to me that the thing he prays for is attainable and he keeps praying until it happens.
This would appear to be just "stuff happening". and when it conforms to what he wanted he goes "yay god".
Confirmation bias at it's finest.
I have a quite stunning admission of confirmation bias from her in this email that about knocked me on my ass by it being so flagrant.
I also have a pretty fantastic admission of Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc that's equally stunning.
(April 23, 2015 at 1:47 pm)Dystopia Wrote: The first premises imply that if you want something and you don't get it or you don't want something but it happens then your emotions (wishful thinking and imagination, delusions, etc.) can be ruled out - This makes sense the first time you read it but I would like to question why your emotions don't play a part in not getting something you want or vice versa
Thanks, Dys. I'm sure this will make more sense when I squish my brain back into my skull and make it work again. Same goes for Jörmungandr <-- however you pronounce that...
Teenaged X-Files obsession + Bermuda Triangle episode + Self-led school research project = Atheist.