RE: Islam is hostile, but there is also lots of bias from muslims and bigotry aswell
January 2, 2017 at 12:55 am
(December 31, 2016 at 5:38 pm)camlov2019 Wrote: That was a good point. I recognize my eagerness was my downfall in that case.
Wonderfully put.
Just like with pretty much any holy book, you can find a contradictory passage for any stance you wish to take on your personal subjective interpretation of something that is clearly not factual. So it's down to your natural predisposition and/or your type of indoctrination that determines which approach you take to it. The entire thing is a pathetic exercise in futility but both the sides that advocate peace and those that advocate genocide are 100% correct because that is easily justifiable depending on what passage you point to and which ones you choose to ignore or interpret differently. But because the book contradicts itself, putting those into practice is foolhardy without a rational justification. So neither approach is actually moral because they're abdicating their responsibility to evolve their own moral code without respect to a source that paradoxically is unquestionable and yet relies entirely upon non-objective interpretation.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.