(February 1, 2017 at 12:57 pm)A Theist Wrote:I don't mean to pick on just you personally, the same question could be asked of anyone cheering on the dismissal. I just don't understand why anyone would support a decision to fire someone for giving advice that a policy may be illegal, if the consequences of ignoring that advice are that a) any decisions made could be overturned thus rendering them pointless, and b) it could result in a bunch of money being paid out in damages.(February 1, 2017 at 11:15 am)ukatheist Wrote: Precisely, its not me that has to pay for trumps stuff ups, the question is why would you want to?
Sent from my ALE-L21 using Tapatalk
With all due respect, UK, why would you even care how I felt about it. The taxes wouldn't be coming out of your pockets.
This doesn't seem to me dependant on whether you support Trump or not, or whether you think the EO is a good idea in principle or not.
