Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 29, 2024, 6:32 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
the Science of deconversion?
#21
RE: the Science of deconversion?
[Image: 184969_10150105076497041_515187040_67512...8432_n.jpg]


Yeah it's a conspiracy theory.. damn fascistsWink

[Image: Umbrella.gif]


And, I typically go for the star gazers anywaysWink
If I were to create self aware beings knowing fully what they would do in their lifetimes, I sure wouldn't create a HELL for the majority of them to live in infinitely! That's not Love, that's sadistic. Therefore a truly loving god does not exist!

Quote:The sin is against an infinite being (God) unforgiven infinitely, therefore the punishment is infinite.

Dead wrong.  The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.

Quote:Some people deserve hell.

I say again:  No exceptions.  Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it.  As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.

[Image: tumblr_n1j4lmACk61qchtw3o1_500.gif]
Reply



Messages In This Thread
the Science of deconversion? - by yuriythebest - October 23, 2010 at 1:29 pm
RE: the Science of deconversion? - by HeyItsZeus - October 23, 2010 at 2:10 pm
RE: the Science of deconversion? - by yuriythebest - October 23, 2010 at 3:17 pm
RE: the Science of deconversion? - by coffeeveritas - November 9, 2010 at 3:00 am
RE: the Science of deconversion? - by Anomalocaris - October 23, 2010 at 2:34 pm
RE: the Science of deconversion? - by HeyItsZeus - October 23, 2010 at 2:39 pm
RE: the Science of deconversion? - by Spectrum - October 23, 2010 at 3:50 pm
RE: the Science of deconversion? - by ldarwin - October 26, 2010 at 11:21 am
RE: the Science of deconversion? - by KichigaiNeko - November 9, 2010 at 9:33 am
RE: the Science of deconversion? - by Darwinian - November 9, 2010 at 9:37 am
RE: the Science of deconversion? - by KichigaiNeko - November 9, 2010 at 9:43 am
RE: the Science of deconversion? - by Mystical - January 20, 2013 at 3:48 am
RE: the Science of deconversion? - by Violet - January 20, 2013 at 3:54 am
RE: the Science of deconversion? - by Tea Earl Grey Hot - January 20, 2013 at 4:10 am
RE: the Science of deconversion? - by Mystical - January 20, 2013 at 4:16 am
RE: the Science of deconversion? - by Violet - January 20, 2013 at 4:16 am
RE: the Science of deconversion? - by Mystical - January 20, 2013 at 4:27 am
RE: the Science of deconversion? - by Violet - January 20, 2013 at 4:36 am
RE: the Science of deconversion? - by Mystical - January 20, 2013 at 4:49 am
RE: the Science of deconversion? - by Violet - January 20, 2013 at 5:01 am
RE: the Science of deconversion? - by Mystical - January 20, 2013 at 5:14 am
RE: the Science of deconversion? - by Violet - January 20, 2013 at 5:34 am
RE: the Science of deconversion? - by Mystical - January 20, 2013 at 5:59 am
RE: the Science of deconversion? - by Mystical - February 22, 2013 at 1:26 am
RE: the Science of deconversion? - by Violet - February 22, 2013 at 4:01 am
RE: the Science of deconversion? - by Mystical - February 22, 2013 at 4:30 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Age of Deconversion John 6IX Breezy 138 10811 November 28, 2019 at 2:09 pm
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  Deconversion and some doubts Jake 232 13120 August 13, 2019 at 11:28 am
Last Post: GrandizerII
  Observational Science vs. Historical Science?! Duke Guilmon 8 3373 April 27, 2014 at 6:53 pm
Last Post: MJ the Skeptical
  The Process of Deconversion FallentoReason 6 2783 January 12, 2013 at 5:36 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Deconversion issues. Ziploc Surprise 19 6637 November 1, 2011 at 1:02 pm
Last Post: Ziploc Surprise



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)