The link he provided, is a laugh. If you read it properly, the term evolutionist has one result, which is not listed on the page. It then moves on and defines the word evolution, not evolutionist.
If he really wants to freak out over the proper use of the language, and a single word at that than screw it. We wouldn't be able to understand anything he wrote anyways.
If he really wants to freak out over the proper use of the language, and a single word at that than screw it. We wouldn't be able to understand anything he wrote anyways.
