Hey I resemble that I am an educated whack job, not your everyday run of the mill whack job. You know I do try and shorten my walls of text but that is impossible when talking about scientific inquiry, you have to be very percise. You do know supernatural = illogical and vice versa but since you find it hard to follow even simple logical flow or as we say in computer science a flow guide, I will let that slide. I find it hillarious that if i am talking nonsense you couldn't point out my flaw in reasoning, so i must conclude i have no flaw in my reasoning. You just don't want anybody to challenge your atheism "beliefs" which I respect.
Oh eldinero, I did put forth my side of the evidence in that wall of text i posted, i saw no rebuttal to my conclusions, no specifics pointed out which you say are false. My whole premise denies the fact that any logical process can't account for the universe as we know it. Please show me my error by making a simple complete model of how the universe can come into being from absolute nothing. That's not shifting the burden that's called called waiting for a rebutal.
Oh eldinero, I did put forth my side of the evidence in that wall of text i posted, i saw no rebuttal to my conclusions, no specifics pointed out which you say are false. My whole premise denies the fact that any logical process can't account for the universe as we know it. Please show me my error by making a simple complete model of how the universe can come into being from absolute nothing. That's not shifting the burden that's called called waiting for a rebutal.