Ten Reasons I'm Not a Christian

[organiccornflake]

Lets see - Genesis is Historically and scientifically proven WRONG

Really? This is new to me. Please provide me with scientific facts (that aren't thereories) that contradict the genesis story? Actualy, ill take it a step farthur. Provide me with a just a link to a reliable source about a well accepted theory that contradicts the genesis story (before you waste your time; neither the big bang theory, or the theory of evolution do. However, if you don't believe i would be happy to discuss this with you.)

THe great Flood NEVER happened- and that is proven by the successive Pharaohs in Egypt unstopped by such a flood.

Where did you get this too? The flood would have happened before there was a "pharaohs". And even if it did, I do not believe the flood to have been global (more in depth here.).

THERE is no support for the fables of moses - bondage at that time with egypt - or the wandering in the desert
THe story of Jericho has been established to be wrong as well

What are your sources for this? You need to research things. I found this source after a single google search. I have a feeling that more would come the more I would search.

Bethlehem was not a city at the time claimed
THe Romans did not crucify thieves - they sent them to the lions. THey only crucified traitors - and direct threats to the state.

Bethlehem was not a city at the time claimed? What time did the bible claim? What are your sources for this information? The romans did not crucify thieves? I have a historical book that says otherwise; What source do you have? ... Jesus was a traitor. He was a direct threat to the state.

THe story of the christ is filled with holes - among those that it is scientifically nonsense as well.

Please explain using well accepted theories or facts.

IF a god HAD impregnated Mary - the result would have been a female - there is NO HUMAN Y chromosome in the mix.

Assuming god was a male human being. God was neither male, or human. He does, however, retain the power to make human y chromosomes.

If we assume a god would have to be a different species than a human - then the result of the mixed procreation would NOT have been a human - but a MUTT of the two different species - like a MULE.

Do you believe that god had sex with Marry? That would be preposterous, as looking at god would kill you. God impregnated her. Not had sex with her. Impregnated her.

And no one saw the ressurection of the christ - even in the bible - there is NO eye witness to such an event - why would a god go through all that preparation - and not have any witnesses to it?

Huh? The entire new testiment is account after account after account.

The evidence that christians are idiots -= yes indeed you have proven that with your link

If not understanding your arguments make me an idiot; than I am as you say. What specifically about my link did you find so idiotic? That it contained theories that allow science and Christianity to co-exist peacefully?

Know why you hate something before you hate it. I challenge you to challenge your beliefs, just as I challenge my own.