RE: Any Evidence For A Historical Jesus?
December 30, 2011 at 7:48 am
(This post was last modified: December 30, 2011 at 7:55 am by chi pan.)
no i believe you have it backwards. i presented evidence against you therefore in order to refute evidence you must provide further evidence to prove my evidence faulse. that's how it works. this is an example of how your debate system works.
example: 1st person: "the moon is made of cheese"
2nd person: "i have a rock from the moon and it is not cheese"
1st person: "that rock is not from the moon"
2nd person: "yes it is how can you prove it's not?"
1st person: "it's not up to me to prove that it's up to you"
do you see the flaw? yes this is a rediculous example inteanded to be so simple you can understand it.
if i can provide all the evidence in the world and you can refute it just by saying "no" how is that a good debate system?
example: 1st person: "the moon is made of cheese"
2nd person: "i have a rock from the moon and it is not cheese"
1st person: "that rock is not from the moon"
2nd person: "yes it is how can you prove it's not?"
1st person: "it's not up to me to prove that it's up to you"
do you see the flaw? yes this is a rediculous example inteanded to be so simple you can understand it.
if i can provide all the evidence in the world and you can refute it just by saying "no" how is that a good debate system?
