(January 6, 2012 at 8:43 am)fr0d0 Wrote: You're all confusing presuppositionalism with a conclusion. Like I said. Point 1 fails. Badly. An prime example of skewed logic.
If you've got a problem with point 1 maybe you'd like to explain what it is, rather than just asserting it?
And no, we aren't confused. Presuppositionalism is merely a form of apologetic that makes the explicit assumption that the Christian world-view is true - this makes all conclusions of presuppositionalist arguments fallacious because every presuppositionalist argument is unsound.
Unless you can actually demonstrate that premise 1 "A logical argument with an assumed premise is unsound." is false, that is.
But we already know that it isn't. For an argument to be sound it must be logically valid AND all the premises are shown to be true. An assumed premise necessarily fails the later criteria.
.