(March 12, 2012 at 10:31 am)Rhythm Wrote: It's not a claim, I'm just reiterating what it means to be "designed". Cobbled together unthinkingly is not designed. The representatives of what remain is not design, and patterns, are not designs. ID isn't science, but that doesn't mean it couldn't be, if they had evidence. No other line of criticism really applies if we're talking about science. It's evidence or gtfo, is it not? So why ask for anything else, why even offer them the explanations that do come from evidence? Again, read these discussions, it starts out as "ID is science", but then you hear nothing but arguments and complaints and no science whatsoever. If they won't focus on their own, I want to help them focus.
IDiots claim they are science but they are not. If they are, show the fucking evidence. If you can't, stop making the fucking claim. And once more, stop handwaving the book away as if your a fucking IDiot yourself. I'm through with this stupid crap.
