(May 14, 2012 at 9:19 am)StatCrux Wrote: No it wasn't! that definition was specifically about definitions of male and female! Anyone can read the text.
that definition came after this point, remember?
"right stay on this topic, no diversions. answer the question, what is the definition of male and female? If male and female exist (which you accepted) give your criteria for determining them. You have consistently failed to provide any definitions. "
If anyone can read the text, then why don't you? Zen has been consistently addressing only your position on same sex marriage, not male-female distinction. The statement I gave is applicable to both, marriage and male/female distinction. Since you have provided your incorrect criteria for only one of them, it is obvious which one was being referred to.