Same sex marriage

[kılıç_mehmet]

Oh really? I thought I was responding to the lottery numbers coming up on my screen. I really must have missed what you said.

You did, as a matter of fact. But I hope I could have explained myself with the examples I gave in my last post. We shall see.

Even IF what you say is true, that would not be decided by the colour of your skin, but rather racial and social stereotypes. Without such stereotypes there would be none of what you mention.

"Colour of your skin"...Is a metaphor used by countries like yourselves. Here, we are of all the same "colour" of skin.
Besides, it has been known that "skin colour" is not an appropriate means of determining one's race, as we can safely state that a person from Habeshistan is not of the same race as a Bantu from lower Africa, just as we can say that an Australian Aborginal is not of the same race as any of the two.
Stereotypes...Well, you do not need a stereotype to assert your ethnical heritage. You just need to be born into it.

Oh I understand your points just fine. Your pointing out what a bigot you are.

Getting a strange sense of déjà vu.

You're living in a dreamworld, friend. I wonder when you're going to wake up from it.

I'll just take your word for it Doctor Mehmet.

No, don't take it from me. Take it from the examples I gave.

Are you really so naive? You think wars, ANY war, is fought because of the blood people have?

New level of stupidity here.

Than you can safely tell me that the Greeks in our country have not actively supported the incoming Greek invasion from mainland Greece due to their Greek blood, while the Turks actively opposed with armed resistance.
I think you are really this naive.

Another load of tripe from you Mehmet. Say hello to the fucking Gurkhas you dipshit. They are more loyal to Britain than anyone else on this fucking planet, yet most of them haven't even stepped on the soil of the British Isles.
You seriously must live in your own little bubble.

The Gurkhas, like the say, Irish before their national revolution, were a race of mercenaries, devoid of any real national goals.

If they are loyal to britain more than they are to say, Gurkhaland, I'd say that they are already devoid of any national consciousness. But obviously, they're not. So you see, people do actually always strive for ethnic liberation and the seperation of their own consciousness from whom they perceive as a people that reside over them in a country.


The Irishmen, however, of whose majority speaks the english language, have maintained their national identity, and have struck against britain to win their independence.
The Gurkhas are only a single case of loyalty towards someone besides one's own. And it's really baffling, I believe that the years of living under colonial conditions has melted away their ethnic consciousness, as they can even be found at Singapore, doing the same stuff as policemen.
Whatever.
My points still stand.
I am still waiting how you're going to explain to me that the years and years that we're fighting terrorists who aim to archive an independent Kurdistan is not related to their own bloodline, their own ethnicity.
Obviously, they wish to build a state that is built on the Kurdish national identity.
So can you really tell me that I should not expect a Turk to be more loyal to Turkey, the land of the Turks, than our minorities?
People lie to themselves, and think that minorities love this country. In fact, minorities constantly strive to act against it. A person who is a half-breed, is like a ticking bomb. One can never know for which side he/she will act. The founder of the PKK, Abdullah Öcalan, is a half-breed himself, a Kurdish-Turkish halfbreed.
I need no more proof of the instability of the half-breed.