RE: '...And I'm an Atheist'
August 7, 2012 at 5:39 am
(This post was last modified: August 7, 2012 at 5:55 am by Ace Otana.)
One thing I should make clear is that, if the definition of atheism was changed where it would state that an atheist was someone who believed there is no god (for example), I would no longer be an atheist. However I'd still lack belief in god, I'd still be a non-believer. Changing the definition of atheism won't change my views, nor now state that I do claim there is no god. It'll simply mean that I'm not an atheist, and that nor am I a theist.
As it stands, atheism means without theism. A lack of belief in god or gods. And so by that definition, I'm an atheist.
As it stands, atheism means without theism. A lack of belief in god or gods. And so by that definition, I'm an atheist.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
