(July 2, 2009 at 5:59 am)dagda Wrote: I will change the argument to the existence of poltergeist on a more general scale rather than arguing around a specific case study.No.
If you want to argue the existence of something, you must provide evidence. You originally started with one case study, and I asked for evidence. If you had given it, I would have asked for further case studies. This is how science works (it has to be repeatable). You don't get to say "well screw the case studies" and think that you can simply argue poltergeists into existence.
If there were evidence for poltergeists, finding it should be easy, so please find it for us. I'm talking case studies (multiple ones), videos of poltergeists, photos (although photos are easier to fake), etc. What I don't want is some sob story from a family who could have ulterior motives (i.e. money / fame). I want objective evidence, and given that you claim there is loads, I don't see why it is such a difficult request.
