(December 16, 2012 at 10:37 am)Al-Fatihah Wrote: Response: Yet you failed to provide from any dictionary that the definition of unintelligence provided is wrong, thus exposing and debunking yourself as usual. Thanks for the assistance.
I thought books are not reliable. To quote you before:
Quote:Books can be written in falsehood and with false witnesses, therefore they are not a reliable source of information.
Dictionaries are books. Collections of words. Double standard fallacy, on top of circular logic fallacy, appeal to theism fallacy [unintelligence cannot give rise to intelligence ergo intelligence must have given rise to intelligence ergo the appeal; the experiments that have proven it can have already been cited half a dozen times in this thread, I'm not wasting any further time on your ignorance to show them again]. Endless fallacies. Only one debunked here is you. As usual.