Atheist Idicoy

[Al-Fatihah]

Hey, mister can't-do-a-quote, you do know the difference between a source and a credible source, don't you? What is the difference between 'evidence' and 'verifiable evidence?'

And you still haven't answered my question: You come down with MRSA. Are you going to accept treatment that was developed because medical researchers acknowledge that bacteria evolves?

Response: That's the problem. You don't know the difference, nor do any atheist when defending evolution. For neither you nor any atheist can provide proof that any scientific document that evolution is true is credible, for you have no proof that the author is speaking truthfully. Thus proving evolution is false.

As for your question, it has nothing to do with the topic of atheist accepting evolution as true because a book says so. So your point is pointless.

---

hahaha think about what youre arguing about then direct it towards your own beliefs then get back to us

Response: Likewise.

---

[quote='Surtr' pid='390548' dateline='1358897643']

How the fuck can somebody be this stupid? There's a difference between some loonies claiming they saw a dead black rapper and thousands of scientists observing evolution thousands of times and providing thousands of different pieces of evidence for it. Not to mention it can be observed by anyone once the work is published.

Response: the only difference is that one dummy is called a loony and the other dummies are called scientists. Whatever the name, does change the fact that their dummies. So you should be answering your own question as to how can you be so stupid.