You didn't actually argue that, that, like all your posts, is just repeating naked assertions about God's nature, using modern terminology which is not argued (in the sense of self evident beliefs proving controversial conclusions) and just repeating the same thing over and over.
I don't think I am going to produce a single valid argument from you, and I don't think you know what a valid argument is. It is not that I am trying to insult you, or say that you are stupid or something like that, you can be ignorant of what a valid argument is.
I think you should be aware of the fact though, that you don't know what a valid argument is, because you don't.
I don't think I am going to produce a single valid argument from you, and I don't think you know what a valid argument is. It is not that I am trying to insult you, or say that you are stupid or something like that, you can be ignorant of what a valid argument is.
I think you should be aware of the fact though, that you don't know what a valid argument is, because you don't.
