RE: New Mexico makes it 17 down, 33 to go.
December 20, 2013 at 3:04 am
(This post was last modified: December 20, 2013 at 3:06 am by Lion IRC.)
(December 19, 2013 at 9:43 pm)Ryantology Wrote: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/20/us/new....html?_r=0
Quote:“Procreation,” wrote Justice Edward L. Chavez, author of the opinion, “has never been a condition of marriage under New Mexico law, as evidenced by the fact that the aged, the infertile and those who choose not to have children are not precluded from marrying.”
There's no stopping the fabulanche.
Avalanches fall DOWN slopes.
Strange that procreation got a special mention/exclusion.
The judge probably doesn't care if the offspring are fertile either.
Explain to me again why I need the consent of my pet goat when the goat has no constitutional rights under New Mexico law?