RE: The redneck strike again.
March 12, 2014 at 4:40 am
(This post was last modified: March 12, 2014 at 4:54 am by Little Rik.)
(March 11, 2014 at 2:01 pm)jg2014 Wrote: Why should we change our comparison between a human and a pig. If a pig is an exception to the rule then why is not human also not an exception
Pigs can eat shit without getting sick.
If human would have something in common with pigs then we could say that it is natural for humans to eat shit.
Can't you see how wrong you are?
Quote:You say you have read many references that support you conclusion that humans have a long intestines , yet the only reference you have so far sourced that actually refers to some scientific studies demonstrated the human intestines are around 7m, which according to your table would mean have evolved as an omnivore. I am certainly not saying we should therefore eat meat, however your appeals to nature that we should not eat meat are nonsense on two levels. Firstly we evolved to eat meat, and secondly what is and is not natural is irrelevant for moral considerations. Eating meat is awful and wrong, but your argument merely allows meat eaters to make themselves feel better about their meat eating because they can so easily dismiss your nonsense arguments.
Carnivorous and omnivore do not get cardiovascular diseases while humans do.
The obvious conclusion is that meat eater can deal with saturated fat, cholesterol and toxins while humans can not therefore meat is naturally off the humans menu.
(March 11, 2014 at 11:19 am)Bad Wolf Wrote: You haven't actually explained how addiction works but whatever. Even without researching this stuff myself and just taking George D. Pamplona Roger at his word, this does not answer the point I was making. Although, according to this guy, meat is addictive like caffeine and chocolate, it has nothing to do with what we were discussing. I objected when you compared meat eating, to addiction to illicit drugs such as heroin etc. Addiction is addiction but not on the level you were implying. Try again.
Try again?
It would be a waste of time.
First you ask me the evidence that meat is addictive.
When i give you the evidence you still do not believe so what is the point in trying again?
Even if God would manifest in front your very eyes you would not believe.
You are just hopeless boy. hock:
Quote:And 3 useless links.
It is interesting how you come in a forum in which what is written is not backed up by peer review in 99.9% of the cases.
Why an intelligent scholar like you waste your time reading this forum?