(September 9, 2014 at 1:58 am)Riketto Wrote: After people in this forum come down with statements that deny the existence of God i challenge them to give evidence of their believes.
Is this wrong?
Yes, for the simple reason (you'll like this - simple is right up your street) that having beliefs and not having beliefs are not the same.
(September 9, 2014 at 1:58 am)Riketto Wrote: Why post in a forum when you are not interested in the issue?
Whoever said I/we are not interested in the issue? Other than you, of course.
(September 9, 2014 at 1:58 am)Riketto Wrote: I did asked how it is possible to get God manifested (as evidence of his existence) when you don't give a damn about him?
Again, who apart from you ever said I/we don't give a damn? It does pique my curiosity when people attribute masculine personal pronouns to the god concept, though. It makes me wonder why they do.
(September 9, 2014 at 1:58 am)Riketto Wrote: This would be a good starting point to discuss the issue but no one show any interest.
That may be more to do with the intellectual quality of the debater, rather than disinterest in the subject. I make it a point never to make even eye contact with the nutter on the bus, however much sense he might accidentally make.
(September 9, 2014 at 1:58 am)Riketto Wrote: So what you do in a forum that deal with the existence or not of God when you have no interest in it?
I remind you of the statement of purpose in the forum rules: "These forums were created for the purpose of providing friendly discussion and debate between atheists and other like-minded individuals, as well as theists."
Please take your strawman outside. It's setting off my hayfever.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'