Culture and Respect

[kılıç_mehmet]

To my first question which you did not answer, I ask again, In what context does it not hold, and why not?

And I would prefer if you can avoid directly contradicting yourself in your response.

When there is not a third party involved.
If it was just me and you in a room, and a single loaf of bread, if I take it all for myself by beating you it'd make me right. If I had a change of heart, and chose to share it with yu, it'd still make me right.
But if there was another person in the room, stronger than both of us, and told us to share, then even if I beat you bloody, it would make no difference at all, I'd still have to bow to his demand to share the bread I fought you for.

Which is it?

And if I have 'the ability to' engage in actions that result directly in your death, as per your earlier claim :

The fact is, you don't engage in actions that directly result in my death, you merely pay the person that does.
But even if you did pull the trigger yourself, you'd not have much might in that case.
Besides, why are you so preoccupied with death?
Might does not need to be as such.
For example, a mother can show might over her child by sending her away to her room, that might is reserved to her, even if the child thinks otherwise, or even if another person, say, a family friend, thinks otherwise, the mother has the might to do this. Therefore, she is right, even if others think otherwise, they cannot tell the child to ignore or disobey the command of her mother.

How is it killing you NOT the right thing to do?

If you must, arrange your so called hit. I'll even give you my address, save you the trouble, if you think that ending my existence is the right thing to do. I cannot really say, though that ending my life is not the right thing to do. Everyone has their reasons. Though doing so will not really make you mighty by long shot.