(April 19, 2014 at 8:54 am)Heywood Wrote: You're failing here Esquilax.
You are claiming that I am saying that my proposition must be right because Quantum Mechanics and Bells theorem have yet to be proven wrong.
No, I'm saying that anyone saying that X can never be explained by Y, without knowing what the explanation for X actually is, is committing an argument from ignorance. "I don't know how Y would explain this, therefore it can't," is the subtext of that.
Since you're saying that quantum mechanics and Bell's theorem state that a given thing can never be explained, and my contention is that you've either misunderstood the actual science, or you're overselling the conclusions it came to to reach your desired conclusion. No scientist worth their salt, leastways where accepted theories are concerned, would make a statement like you're characterizing it.
And if you're actually saying that these two things could be wrong, then you haven't really got much of an argument there. You literally would be saying "if I'm right, then I'm right!"
So you're either saying wrong things, or saying nothing at all. Enjoy picking which you wanna go with, there.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!