(May 6, 2014 at 5:39 pm)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: Nope.
I made no value judgement as the truth claims of the god(s).
Fair enough.
Quote: Merely stated a fact that every believer believes in a different version of whatever god it is they worship.
You’ve polled every believer concerning their definition of god?
Quote: It's easily testable. Like you said, ask anyone what their god 'is' and you'll get a different reply for every person you ask.
I do not believe that is the case at all; most Reformed Christians are going to define god exactly how the Westminster Confession of Faith does for example.
Quote: So when you ask if its relevant, I think it actually is the most truthful and accurate answer that can be given to the OP.
I am still not seeing the relevance. If I ask people to define a square for me, those who do not say it is a figure with four corners, right angles, and equal sides are just wrong. Their answer does not actually determine the definition. If someone tries to tell me that a god is defined as any person named Bill I am going to just come to the conclusion that they’re wrong.
Quote: As to truth claims, well, I'll just say that tangible evidence is much better than no evidence at all.
What do you mean by tangible evidence?
