Your statement in #1 about Christianity having a 0.001% of being correct based on the number of other religions is logical nonsense. With your logic, that would mean the if Christianity was the only religion, that it would be 100% probable?
Regarding #2, I would like to hear your list of how everything in the Bible has been disproved by science. The Bible was not written as a science text--to assume so is mere ignorance of its content.
If you are going to say that creation/6000 years have been disproved, then you are passing judgement on a literal 6-day creation view. There is no evidence that that is the only possible interpretation of that passage. Many believe that they represent ages and interpreting it so does not change the meaning of Genesis or Christianity as a whole. In fact, many believe that God some version of evolution to get to what we have today.
If you are going to add in the the issue of miracles, why is that a proof that the Bible has been disproved by science? A miracle is an event that cannot occur naturally. But that does not leave out the possibility of an outside force causing such an event to happen. No laws of nature are broken since natural laws assume only natural causation. You would have to disprove #2 (or show it is less probably than its opposite) below to use the miracle argument to disprove the Bible.
1. If God exists, miracles exist
2. God Exists
3. Therefore miracles exist.
Regarding #2, I would like to hear your list of how everything in the Bible has been disproved by science. The Bible was not written as a science text--to assume so is mere ignorance of its content.
If you are going to say that creation/6000 years have been disproved, then you are passing judgement on a literal 6-day creation view. There is no evidence that that is the only possible interpretation of that passage. Many believe that they represent ages and interpreting it so does not change the meaning of Genesis or Christianity as a whole. In fact, many believe that God some version of evolution to get to what we have today.
If you are going to add in the the issue of miracles, why is that a proof that the Bible has been disproved by science? A miracle is an event that cannot occur naturally. But that does not leave out the possibility of an outside force causing such an event to happen. No laws of nature are broken since natural laws assume only natural causation. You would have to disprove #2 (or show it is less probably than its opposite) below to use the miracle argument to disprove the Bible.
1. If God exists, miracles exist
2. God Exists
3. Therefore miracles exist.
