Disproving the Bible

[FatAndFaithless]

Steve, you still seem to not understand why you need to stop quoting articles from creationist websites if you want any sort of scientific discussion. As we've made painstakingly clear, those kinds of sites are anything but scientific. You can see the differences in just the way their websites are set up.

So the person that had the thoughts that were written down for all to read must be wrong because he/she believes something you do not. Isn't that a genetic fallacy? What did you think of the arguments that seem to be well reasoned (more so than the original article proclaiming enough time)?

You keep using that word, I don't think it means what you think it means.

No but really, the reason it's wrong is because it's scientifically and factually wrong. They start with the premise that their creationism is true, and they look for bits and pieces of evidence that can maybe be twisted to fit into their viewpoint, while outright ignoring the vast, vast majority of evidence that refutes their conclusion on this topic. That's is not science. It's pseudoscience. It's the same tactic used by woo-doctors psychics and homeopathy. Science draws conclusions based on where the evidence leads, creationists grab and twist evidence to fit their pre-drawn conclusion.