Cato,
The system did not fail. The people would have to VOTE out the nonsense in Congress(refer to the 10th Amendment). I fully think, that our system has been hijacked by some zealots calling themselves by several names and labels.
The executive branch is not perfect. Nevertheless, the legislative branch is much more of a problem especially if it is directed and controlled by zealots who think they are doing the right thing.
The judicial branch has been also hijacked by these zealots. The ones who tries to champion a thing called the "religious question" are nothing more than sabotuers of the very system they are trying to defend.
The zealotry I am referring to is the so-called Christian millennialistic world-view. A world-view which is not supported even in the New Testament.
The national constitution of the United States never allowed a "religious test" for government office(Article 6 section 3), so how does it come about that the "religious question" was ever formed in the first place?
If their "God" is so powerful why have defenders of the faith? It seems that their defense, and attempt to defend their faith, is the same mistake of the crusaders and inquisitions.
The system did not fail. The people would have to VOTE out the nonsense in Congress(refer to the 10th Amendment). I fully think, that our system has been hijacked by some zealots calling themselves by several names and labels.
The executive branch is not perfect. Nevertheless, the legislative branch is much more of a problem especially if it is directed and controlled by zealots who think they are doing the right thing.
The judicial branch has been also hijacked by these zealots. The ones who tries to champion a thing called the "religious question" are nothing more than sabotuers of the very system they are trying to defend.
The zealotry I am referring to is the so-called Christian millennialistic world-view. A world-view which is not supported even in the New Testament.
The national constitution of the United States never allowed a "religious test" for government office(Article 6 section 3), so how does it come about that the "religious question" was ever formed in the first place?
If their "God" is so powerful why have defenders of the faith? It seems that their defense, and attempt to defend their faith, is the same mistake of the crusaders and inquisitions.
