This debate will be between myself and His_Majesty, on the question outlined in the title. I will be arguing the affirmative position, that acceptance of evolution is sufficiently justified by the evidence, and my opponent will be arguing the reverse.
We will each be presenting an opening statement, followed by a response to those each, and then a further response round, without length limitations. We will be allowed up to one week between responses, as needed, to properly formulate a response.
We have both read the debate rules as listed in this section, and are essentially playing by those. I'll open up a public thread for discussions by non-participants once we've gotten started, and link to it here.
Other than that, good luck to my opponent.
We will each be presenting an opening statement, followed by a response to those each, and then a further response round, without length limitations. We will be allowed up to one week between responses, as needed, to properly formulate a response.
We have both read the debate rules as listed in this section, and are essentially playing by those. I'll open up a public thread for discussions by non-participants once we've gotten started, and link to it here.
Other than that, good luck to my opponent.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
