RE: Indiana's Govenor Signs 'Religious Freedom' Bill
April 13, 2015 at 11:21 am
(This post was last modified: April 13, 2015 at 11:22 am by Heywood.)
(April 13, 2015 at 4:56 am)robvalue Wrote: 3. Your reason for homosexuals being inferior makes no sense anyway. I can just as easily make this argument. There are two genders, so one of them must be superior. Imagine what would happen if all of one gender died out. If it was women, that would be it. Humanity would end. But if men all died out, the women could use sperm banks and be able to repopulate the earth. Therefor, by the same reason as your argument, women are superior to men. Therefor, it's OK to discriminate against men, because they are inferior. If you think that argument is stupid, look how closely it models your own one.
I believe woman are superior to men.....for reasons similar to the argument you made. By the words, "superior" and "inferior" I mean "superior value to humanity" and "inferior value to humanity". Women have more value to humanity than men.
This ideal, that genders are equivalent, that sexual orientations are equivalent, doesn't really make sense to hold if you are an atheist. If there is no God, why would nature deem it necessary to create these thing equivalent? Do you think nature made these things equivalent as matter of pure happenstance? Equivalent genders, equivalent orientations, only make sense if a God exists Who decided to design it that way.
