(March 27, 2010 at 1:48 am)tackattack Wrote: No I understand and follow both of your logic. That wasn't the original question though.
What he asked is can the term ignorance deny it's own ignorance. Which of course is ridiculous or ludicris I won't put the picture!
Oh. I seem to have missed the point entirely.
Have I mentioned I'm just a poor old pensioner and easily confused?
PS: It's redical-----errr radastam--err----ridicular--err-stuff it!-----it's silly.