Supreme Court Same Sex Marriage Argumet

[Ace]

You seem to think that because I agree with one part of the statement, I must agree with the other.  I hold that truth to be self evident -regardless-.  I'm perfectly satisfied with those inalienable rights being endowed by...wait for it......us.  It makes absolutely no difference.  Point of fact....we did the endowing, or else we wouldn't have needed to write that.

Nnnoooo, that is a big false equivalence and one no one should ever be content with that idea. The “little changes” unravels the entire meaning of what was being stated. For some unknown origin the people of today have been holding on to this assumed correct notion that adding, subtracting, or altering some words here or there will have no impact on the meaning of  words, statements, definitions, or ideas.

Because one who may not believe or accept the concept of a divinity it would seem understandable to  just replaced some other being that is real to you. Yet, that assumption is extreme false.

In regards to inalienable rights, us can never bestowed what is inalienable on us, by us, and no one should ever want us to. We, us may place laws, rules, and punishments on ourselves but, in no way can, us bestowed inalienable rights to us. Simply because if it is us that is doing the bestowing of inalienable then the inhabitable is in no way longer inhabitable! Maybe a Human right but not inhabitable.

Remember that what is an inhabitable, (in this case right’s) are unable to be taken away from or given away by the possessor;  incapable of being alienated, surrendered, or transferred by any man. Men can and do give and take way laws, rights, goods, freedoms, justices, and many other things but what is inhabitable, by definition, no man can . . . .
This is why the drifters of the Independents make the correlation of inalienable rights are endowed or bestowed by something divine.

“Rights are either God-given as part of the divine plan, or they are granted by government as part of the political plan. If we accept the premise that human rights are granted by government, then we must be willing to accept the corollary that they can be denied by government.”
― Ezra Taft Benson,