The problem with debating evolution/creation is that biology is a VERY complex subject. Someone like Ken Hamm, for example, could ask, 'If evolution is true, how did woodpeckers evolve?' This isn't a question that can be answered in the one, three, or five minutes usually allowed for responses in a debate. When the biologist in the debate tries to answer, topics like morphology, co-evolution and habitat pressure tend to make audiences glaze over.
Boru
Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson
