(November 24, 2015 at 7:41 pm)TheRealJoeFish Wrote: In the abstract, I don't have a problem with, as Chad says, "prioritizing" families.
But is the thinking behind it that a single man is the most likely to be a terrorist? Then won't all the single terrorist men get wives? And then they'll block newly married couples, so won't the terrorists recruit dudes who are already married? And have families? And...
They were painting this a security measure yes. I agree in that regard its shit, because as I stated earlier I suspect there is a disproportionate number of gay men in and among radical Muslims. Not because gays are bad, but because they're more likely to try to make up for their "impurity" by being uber faithful. We seen this with ted haggard.
To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,
To the last syllable of recorded time;
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!
Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player,
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,
To the last syllable of recorded time;
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!
Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player,
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
