RE: Transexuals
April 11, 2016 at 6:14 pm
(This post was last modified: April 11, 2016 at 6:17 pm by Goosebump.
Edit Reason: fill made me full
)
(April 11, 2016 at 6:07 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:(April 11, 2016 at 5:58 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Maybe they would, maybe they wouldn't. Some people may very well get off on that specific type of scenario. The point is, should we take the risk at the expense of women? The risk can easily be avoided with a third, gender neutral bathroom.
Also, should the requirement for transgender folks without surgical reassignment using the opposite sex bathroom/lockerroom be that they are in "full drag?" What if they're at the gym, or only had time to put on a little lipstick and padded bra that day?
Well since there are no transgender incidents of attacks in bathrooms I don't think any risk is being taken "at the expense of women". If you can point to the overwhelming problem of strait men dressing up as women to attack real women in bathrooms please share it.
I think a "third bathroom" is unrealistic.
If somebody isn't in "full drag" what's the problem? Don't all non-single occupant public bathrooms have stalls? Isn't there a law for that?
"I'm thick." - Me