(April 15, 2016 at 11:41 am)Drich Wrote: This thread is gotten away from me. I'll be the first to admit it. The problem is none of you seem to want to address the points I've been making. you all just continue to spin everything back to bigotry and hate.
However in truth I have raised several issues that none of you want to address. The chief of which is who is responsible when someone using these laws to fish or troll in the wrong bathroom decides to step things up and someone gets hurt because of it?
Or why do we have laws on the books that makes people vulnerable to predators at all? especially if this law only benefits less than 1% of the population?
Again I don't care if a woman who is now physically a man uses the mens room, what I will not abid is being made to stand outside the woman's room waiting for my 8 year old, while an obvious man in a dress walks in behind her!
P/C bullshit aside if anyone of you were in a situation like that and you did not know this man in a dress from adam you can't tell me your initial reaction would be the same if it were a grandmother who followed your daughter in the lady's room.
If and when this happens Lord help me I will be on the news because I will not let that go down.
Bullshit. My replies SPECIFICALLY addressed the question you posed in the OP about "mentally compromised people" setting policy. Others have specifically discussed points about the definitions you sited and discussed the brain physiology, whether the law makes people vulnerable, and plenty of other relevant info related to your OP.
Of course, plenty of your wording and implications merit conversation about bigotry and hate, but you cannot say that nobody has addressed your points.