(April 18, 2016 at 11:48 am)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote:(April 18, 2016 at 11:12 am)paulpablo Wrote: I didn't see this post before. I thought we were talking about if it would be easier for a person allowed into the toilets legally being able to peep than someone not allowed into toilets. My only point was that it's easier to commit offences in toilets that you're legally allowed to go into. No I can't imagine many rapists bothering to dress up as women to rape.
Um, you're already "allowed" to go into toilets anyway, because the door isn't locked and no one guards them. It's as easy as that. The idea that making it okay for transgenders makes it "easier" for someone to do that kind of thing is patently ridiculous.
If a transgender lady still is not transitioned, to the point that she still looks entirely like a man, she's not going to feel comfortable going into a womens' room and standing out. She'll use the men's room until such time as she feels comfortable moving to a more appropriate location where she can fit in. And yet, we're discussing the comfort of the straight people, just in case they notice a person who doesn't quite fit in?
How can y'all not see that this is the same exact argument that was used against desegregation and gay rights? It's being used now against the BLM movement, with the "well what about white people's feelings!?!" counter.
When you are a majority looking to take away rights of a minority that is already telling you they are under constant (literal) assaut, either verbally or physically, or you try in any other way repress them, it is the highest degree of inanity to then claim it's YOUR discomfort and fear that should be taken into account.
FFS!
Because transexuals are freaks. No one cares about their feelings