(June 17, 2016 at 10:00 am)Thomas Kelly252525 Wrote:(June 17, 2016 at 8:59 am)Veritas_Vincit Wrote: Thomas,
--You aren't getting it. You have the burden of proof, until you demonstrate your claim that someone tampered with the Bible, I do not believe it.--
What may you think proves I wasn't willing to put forward for your consideration the truth about The Bible ?
If you thought you could prove to someone that The Bible would still be imperfect even if all the bad parts were taken out, do you think the burden of proof is on you if someone claims otherwise ?
--I am not saying that I know that it is false, then I don't know that any number of matter! Anything that can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.--
Do you think I was saying you know that it's false ? Do you think I've not been willing to give you the evidence ?
--I have read the Bible. I know what it says - but take the example of Abraham and his son - I submit that it is evil to ask someone to kill their child. If you heard a voice you thought to be God ask you to kill your child, would you just do it?!--
I think we both think that the example of Abraham and his son was bad in what you talked about above. So you may consider it was inserted maliciously.
Veritas Vincit, you may look at my answers above.
Again, why would a perfect being (and god is perfect per christian doctrine) allow his divine word to be tampered with?
You've brought up this "tampered with the word of god nonsense" a number* of times now, but have failed to give any kind of a response to my query every time I ask it of you. It is very relevant to what you are trying to establish.
*I was going to use "couple" here, but then I realised that the Irish interpretation of couple is pretty unique.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
Home