RE: If free will was not real
August 1, 2016 at 12:14 pm
(This post was last modified: August 1, 2016 at 12:14 pm by RozKek.)
(August 1, 2016 at 12:02 pm)Irrational Wrote:(August 1, 2016 at 11:59 am)RozKek Wrote: It doesn't really matter what other people are debating. Let's say no one is debating the free will I'm talking about, but I am and I think it's important and has a basis in reality. And what gets more objective than physics? I'm using physics, the physical reality and the laws of physics to argue against free will, it doesn't get more objective than that. You're made of particles just like planet earth is, both of you are governed by the laws of physics, both of you are going to move and act only in one possible way, but you can always dream of other things you could've done, sure.
Rozkek, the laws of physics don't tell you what constitutes freedom, though. Come on.
That's not the point. Your will is from the brain. Your brain is physical and is governed by the laws of physics. If the actions of your neural net are determined then your will is also determined. Your will cannot equal Y if your neural net says it equals X, I don't know if the last sentence was a good way of demonstrating it, but yeah, hope you get it. Also, freedom is just a concept made by humans, it's just an idea. There's no deeper meaning to it.
