(August 19, 2016 at 7:17 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote:(August 19, 2016 at 6:35 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Wrong, science is based upon experimental observations that are replicable. It doesn;t matter whether or not someone else saw it, if no one else sees it when they do the same thing. In fact, it doesn't matter that almost everyone sees it...if a single person doesn't. That's the -entire- point of peer review and replication.
You're welcome.
But they could be lying, crazy, or made a mistake?
That's where peer review and replication comes in. Which would be corroborating evidence.
Still waiting for such for the NT.
"I was thirsty for everything, but blood wasn't my style" - Live, "Voodoo Lady"