RE: Who would be a better president? Sean Penn vs Ted Cruz
August 3, 2016 at 11:59 pm
(This post was last modified: August 4, 2016 at 12:04 am by Thumpalumpacus.)
(August 3, 2016 at 1:41 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote:(August 3, 2016 at 1:30 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote: Beats anything from fox.
No, if Fox news had a source that you could go back and check for yourself, that would be better for sure. It's about the information itself, not the station. Joe Scarborough saying that an unnamed source told him months ago that Trump didn't know why we didn't use nuclear weapons (although he actually said two things, first that he asked three times about nuclear weapons in general, and then later sort of added that he didn't understand why we didn't use them, it was all very stammery and weird) it begs the obvious question:
If this source said this months ago, why didn't you say it months ago!?! Don't you think this is important information that the American people should know? Why is it only coming out when Hillary Clinton starts making nuclear weapons a talking point in her campaign?? Seems fishy, to say the least.
My point however is that how can people trash on Donald Trump and say that Sean Penn is more qualified then Ted Cruz? So people who don't understand why anybody would support Trump just have to imagine this scenario and why they would pick Sean Penn to understand Donald Trump's support. I thought the article was interesting and enlightening.
lol, ignorance of nuclear usage is not a disqualifier in your view?
You're looking a lot like Corporal Normal right now, Captain Awesome. You'd rather vote against a candidate because the media sat on a story, than vote against a candidate because he doesn't understand nuclear doctrine?
I'll vote for smarts, you can vote for ignorance, and Min can shit his Depends no matter who wins.
