(August 23, 2016 at 9:49 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote:(August 23, 2016 at 9:09 am)LadyForCamus Wrote: @Esquilax:
Just to offer you a puzzle piece to this picture he is haphazardly trying to throw together in case you missed it, RoadRunner thinks scientific research is nothing more than "testimony" that requires "faith" to accept, on par with religious scripture in terms of quality of evidence for things (he stated so in another thread just DAYS ago). Considering how he is referring to science in THIS thread, he's either a very dishonest or very confused individual, so...yeah, have fun with that. [emoji41]
*popcorn*
I made no such comparison. And I stated as much, when you tried to goad me into doing so; on such generalized terms. And I don't think that you made much of a case, that we do not need to rely on transfer of knowledge based on one who experienced a thing, and shares that knowledge with another, nor that their is a certain amount of trust that must be involved.
Now if you have something to add to this conversation, I would ask that you please be more specific. If I am wrong in my thinking, I can't correct anything based on such broad snipes.
Also, I bear no responsibility for making a case against a negative claim about what is NOT needed for something. You made the claim "faith" is required, and you failed to back it without using fallacious tactics. I'd think you would have learned this by now...[emoji12]
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.
