RE: 'God' is likely atheistic (I, an atheist, shall likely become a 'God', no trolling)
November 3, 2016 at 10:19 pm
(This post was last modified: November 3, 2016 at 10:25 pm by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
(November 3, 2016 at 3:49 pm)Alasdair Ham Wrote:(November 3, 2016 at 1:18 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: Tradition is often wrong. (Only the theistic mind adheres to the concept of omniscient, omnipotent deities)
Thusly, on statistical observation, God/Creator is likely properly, naturally definable as stipulated in my original post.
Yeah I was just saying that if we become superintelligent that doesn't make us deities. Recognize that you're re-defining things and don't equivocate, is all I mean.
Like, why call us "gods" if we're not gods? No one will ever become a god... regardless of if transhumanism succeeds and people become superintelligent.
A particular property of the theistic God, is the ability to generate non-trivial intelligence, ie human-kind.
PROBABLE NON-OMNISCIENT GODS
**(1)** Man-made ‘General artificial intelligence’ (The brain based software we invent [that shall exceed humans in all tasks, not merely individual tasks as they do now]).
**(2)** Intelligence that evolves in our own simulations to become God-like (ie they create universes, or ‘general artificial intelligence’-like programs).
**(3)** The non-omnipotent, non-infinite Gods (human like?) that created our universe stemming from the same way that we simulate more and more detailed universes via **
(4)** — constrained paths. (eg illustris)
**(4)** Mankind; for mankind shall perhaps promptly possess God bound capabilities, via **(1)** and **(2)**.
