RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
November 6, 2016 at 5:44 pm
(This post was last modified: November 6, 2016 at 6:05 pm by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
(November 6, 2016 at 9:19 am)ApeNotKillApe Wrote:(November 6, 2016 at 8:45 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: Thereafter, there exists no contradiction amidst my prior stipulation, for one need not BELIEF, such that one OBSERVES PROBABILITIES.
Probabilistic models can't be made on an unfalsifiable hypothesis. You don't know what you're talking about, you can't know because it's not possible to know.
Even if it turns out you're 100% right about everything, you were only ever right by coincidence, not because you had good reason to believe it.
Nonsense.
NOTE: I have not any belief.
ALBEIT:
Robust-Statistic/Basis [0]
It is observed that brain based models already exceed/equal human performance via cognitive tasks/task groups. (and likelythe task entirety at 2020's horizon on Moore's Law, as said brain based models' hardware shall likely [Moore's Law] approximate the human neuronal cycle 10^15 flops.)
[Ergo, no such unfalsifiable hypothesis persists]
Robust-Statistic/Basis [1]
Therein, Moore's Law has been observable for 50 years.
[Ergo, no such unfalsifiable hypothesis persists]
Albeit, keenly observe the usage of the word likely, amidst stipulations of mine.