RE: Milo Yiannopoulos; the man twitter banned got a book deal. Currently #2 on Amazon.
February 2, 2017 at 2:28 pm
(February 2, 2017 at 2:15 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote:(February 2, 2017 at 2:11 pm)Orochi Wrote: Yup and I hold myself to that same standard if you going to go around spewing bile to piss people off and stir up anger by being as vile as possible. Then don't be surprised if it comes back to bit you. what goes around comes around. Those who are not willing to endure all for there beliefs clearly have none. Milo issue is he thinks he entitled to a soap box and whines when ones not provided so he can make an ass of himself and waste peoples time.
That is free speech fundamentalism
No. That's not free speech fundamentalism, that's ludicrous and dangerous. I really don't know how to respond to this.
You're saying: People who respond violently to speech that upsets them shouldn't be arrested, and it's the fault of the one who expressed the speech. They should've simply kept their mouth shut if they didn't want to be assaulted.
That's the opposite of the principle of free speech. I feel like I'm taking crazy pills; I can't be the only one here who thinks that's a horrible viewpoint to hold.
As I said if you provoke people on purpose to anger the way milo does the way my Klan scenario does. Then your entitled to no protection. Now I of course would stand up for someone being beaten for expressing there opinion(even Milo) but it's not an entitlement. And no it's not your free to speak your not entitled to protection from the consequences of what you say.
and yes it's free speech fundamentalism because if you believed in it there shouldn't be anything you fear saying nor should you fear the consequences
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Inuit Proverb