★★ We are all atheists/atheistic to ALL Gods (says simple science)

[Simon Moon]

---

That is not the definition used by most philosophers or cognitive scientists.

The Stanford Encyclopedia (considered one of the best) defines it thus:

"Contemporary analytic philosophers of mind generally use the term “belief” to refer to the attitude we have, roughly, whenever we take something to be the case or regard it as true."

"Most contemporary philosophers characterize belief as a “propositional attitude”.

There is nothing about the need to be absolute about beliefs.

Belief is  simply the psychological state in which one accepts a premise or proposition to be true.

I believe the proposition that my girlfriend loves me, but I do not believe with absolute certainty.

I believe that evolution is true, but my beliefs are provisional and not absolute, based on evidence.

As David Hume said: "A Wise man proportions his belief to the evidence."

---

In other words, it is possible to have beliefs held at various degrees of certainty.

It appears you failed to reduce the initial passage.

In addition to google's initial result (to accept as true), I extracted that of the definitions from 38 definition websites, (including standford).

A largely frequent paradigm, 'truth' | true, is compounded in non-beliefism premise-1.

This had long been mentioned amidst the initial passage's sources.





Thusly, it is clear? that belief need not constitute certainty.
HOWEVER, belief is primarily truth bound, on the horizon of truth's PROFOUND presence betwixt belief, and it's synonyms.




%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Perhaps it is pertinent that you approach premise-ii.

There have been frequent failed attempts to disregard premise-i, however narrow attempts betwixt premise-ii:

---

Non-beliefism/Premise[ii]:

Belief may constitute non-science.

Logic/science in contrast, shan’t encode non-science.

…ie scientific evidence shan’t contain non-scientific-evidence.

Thereafter, it is illogical to believe.

---

I see the word 'true' and 'truth' in the various definitions, but none of them state anything about having ABSOLUTE certainty.

I have plenty of beliefs. None of them I believe with ABSOLUTE certainty.

All of them are open to become disbeliefs, if shown evidence to do so.