(February 1, 2017 at 11:51 am)Drich Wrote:http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/(January 31, 2017 at 8:57 pm)Fake Messiah Wrote: Yeah I see you're new around here, but that person only believes in the Bible - you know that the world is flat, unicorns are real - the whole package; and that everything else (including modern science) is a hoax, so good luck reasoning with that person.
No I'm saying the .gov makes nasa a puppet of .gov
Give it a few years and you'll see what I mean.
Most recently when clinton took office there was a huge hole in the ozone #Nasa.gov
When bush II took office the ozone hole magically became a naturally reoccuring natural phenoma and HFC's weren't the only factor. Again #Nasa.gov
Now that trump is in office let us wait and see what happens when some of the non global warming money hits Nasa and let's wait and see how quickly you are to quote Nasa.gov in the near future concerning this topic.
(February 1, 2017 at 5:03 am)Tazzycorn Wrote: Because no amount of evidence is sufficient to make Dripshit changehis mind when he doesn't agree with something, while no evidence is needed to prove what he does believe in.
You are the one ignoring 5-0-0 -y-e-a-r-s Of Scientific evidence for this junk science Al gore decided to make popular and tried to cash in on.
(February 1, 2017 at 11:24 am)Faith No More Wrote: Lol, "zero-emission" power source? I guess all of the radioactive waste doesn't count. Why don't you ask Fukishima how awesome nuclear power is?
Yes, it's all the environmentalists fault we don't have clean energy. Black is white. Up is down. It's not like the auto industry killed a super-effective carburetor in the 70's or the oil companies have done everything in their power to keep us on fossil fuels by defunding the alternative power sources like solar. Yeah, they're ineffective, because that's how the oil companies want to keep it. And funny how we're just barely getting viable electric cars now, but the electric car was invented over 100 years ago. I guess you'll probably blame that on the hippies, too.
You and Drich should go create your own society on an island somewhere where you can claim that 2+2=5 and stop fucking up the world everyone else is trying to salvage so their kids have a viable planet to live on.
The thread is titled "Another Reason Christians Are Dangerous," and you guys are absolutely driven to prove that true.
Glob...
How do you not see that if you are right and global warming is due to increased carbon emissions the only way to stop this is to reduce the population? Or learn a cheaper way to 'scrub' carbon from oxygen that will work on a planetary scale?
Since we are doing nothing to curtail either, that means a simple reduction in emissions will have zero effect. So what do you guys do, of course you tax the stupid because they won't know any better. they don't know under you model you are planning for a slow agonizing planetary death. Again IF your junk science is right.
NOW Say I'm right. Or rather 500 years of past scientific discovery concerning global climate change is right. and carbon/air simply unlocks the potential energy stored in the radiant heat coming from the sun, making the sun the reason for warmer and colder weather. (making warmer weather marginally hotter and colder weather not as cold to more avaiable carbon there is.) That would allow the political eliete to tax the stupid people and call it whatever "The sky is falling branding they like" and the problem will correct itself in a few years.
Ever wonder why we don't TSIF term "Global warming anymore?" and why we moved on to climate change?
Because when ever you b-holes settle on a direction (warming or cooling) the climate changes again. So unless we have no weather changes you have a TSIF term that covers everything the weather does if it is not the same as the day before.
Again, give it a few years.. let the none global warming money have a chance to sink in and change the minds of 'science.'
Then you'll be able to see what science really is.. a whore. There is someone out there willing to research and back whatever crazy theory you want he just needs the money to convince people like you
%97 of scientist believe global climate change is real. Did the Clinton's and Al Gore pay them all? The fact is there's no such thing as "big science." But big oil has enough money to fill a football stadium and they still can only bribe 3% of scientists. The name didn't change from global warming because it isn't getting hotter. It's because the warming can have a lot worse side effects.
Sent from my LGL52VL using Tapatalk
