(February 24, 2017 at 10:51 am)pool the great Wrote: What was that term they use to describe people that force socially defined gender characteristics on others? Hmm... I think I know this one, they're people that are said to perpetuate "gender stereotypes"...oh now I remember... wasn't it "sexist"? Or was it misandrist?
I don't care what anyone else calls it. Since you're too dumb to get my point, I'll spell it out for you: by your own standards of male virility and machismo, you fail. You fail miserably. You're a whiny, puling little child who pretends to be a man, and you don't like having it pointed out to you.
(February 24, 2017 at 10:51 am)pool the great Wrote: So let me get this straight Thump, you are a feminist that support perpetuating gender stereotypes and ...misandry?
Uh, no. Where'd you get the idea that I'm a feminist? I'm an egalitarian, asshole. I think all people ought to be treated equally until they prove unworthy ... as has happened with you.
(February 24, 2017 at 10:51 am)pool the great Wrote: See it's clear now. You have no clue what we're talking about here, you're just desperately trying to join in on the conversation trying to stay relevant.
You keep telling yourself that, kid. In the meantime, you'd ought to get ready for the lesson life is going to deliver you. It's coming. It's called growing up.
(February 24, 2017 at 10:51 am)pool the great Wrote: Why don't you first go educate yourself on the topic you supposedly seem to advertise yourself as an expert and then I may consider having a discussion with you. You're just wasting both our time, consider this my last reply to your cry baby posts.
Hey, it ain't me crying about being picked on. If you don't like "cry-babies", perhaps first you should attend the beam in your own eye?
Also, feel free to link to the post wherein I claimed expertise. That's right, you can't, because I didn't. That's just you, once more, flailing around for some way to leave this exchange with the appearance of intelligence.
Don't hold your breath for a discussion with me -- you're not worth listening to, given that your information is so obviously filtered through your precepts. I can get your talking points elsewhere without having to put up with a smarmy jackass delivering them in his thoughtless and shallow manner.
Put shortly, you're beneath me.