Thanks for posting the video. I've seen about 10 minutes of the video by skipping here and there (and I'll watch more of it later), but I think I get the gist of his argument, which is that what is morally "right" is that which increases happiness and well-being, and what is morally "wrong" is that which increases harm and suffering. So, it seems like he's defending the moral theory of desirism (which theVOID also holds) *shudders*. However, I've also read somewhere that desirism may not be an objective morality since desires are based on one's own personal attitudes and/or goals and they vary from one person to another.
See this: Is Desirism An Objective Moral Theory?
So having said that ... morality is a complicated subject for me (kinda like politics), and for many others, and people have all kinds of different views, and that's why I'm just putting out my own thoughts. I can't speak for others.
See this: Is Desirism An Objective Moral Theory?
So having said that ... morality is a complicated subject for me (kinda like politics), and for many others, and people have all kinds of different views, and that's why I'm just putting out my own thoughts. I can't speak for others.