I'm not looking over the point. The fact is, in the model, there either are such thing as transcendent dice or there are not. If there are, then they exist. If there are none, or if the very idea of transcendent dice is absurd then they do not exist.
I think the point you are trying to make is that if we accept the typical definition of God, we then change the rules of existence so that the word no longer has any meaning. But I think then that you are being to narrow in your definition of "existence."
If the transcendent dice are there, then "existence" encompasses the physically as well as the transcendental.
I think the point you are trying to make is that if we accept the typical definition of God, we then change the rules of existence so that the word no longer has any meaning. But I think then that you are being to narrow in your definition of "existence."
If the transcendent dice are there, then "existence" encompasses the physically as well as the transcendental.
