(July 9, 2017 at 11:22 am)mordant Wrote:(July 4, 2017 at 10:36 am)Little Rik Wrote: The facts speak for themselves.
Atheists try to say that NDEs are not real.
Total fail.
Atheists could not explain what philosophy is all about.
Total fail.
Argument after argument atheists fail to win a single argument.
Total fail so why should I be guilty of bias?
Even if for the sake of argument your judgments above were true, that has zilch to do with whether or not you are engaging in confirmation bias.
"He did it first" or "they do it to" are middle school-level "arguments" that demonstrate nothing.
The question is, do you begin with a conclusion and cherry pick or interpret evidence to support the conclusion, not?
(July 4, 2017 at 8:42 am)Little Rik Wrote: Beside is more likely that a crowd of people that say the same thing is more reliable then a single personNo. It's a data point, of course, but only a minor one. And most people have been wrong about many things throughout history. Flat earth. Bleeding and leeches. Any number of things. You are engaging in argument from popularity here.
Please stop feeding the troll (and you're being far too charitable calling those arguments 'middle school level'). This is a human being incapable of understanding the infinite regress problem of 'who created the creator'. Like, they literally cannot even comprehend that this presents an issue with the logic they're saying we are ignoring.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.